![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
| Home | About us | Testimonials | Contact us | ||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Tips and advice The method applied to the external restoration of a building is illustrated below:
Stage 1 The decayed mortar is raked out using traditional hand tools to approximately twice the width of the mortar joint. The traditional method is preferable to mechanical techniques such as angle grinders due to unavoidable damage of cuts to the brickwork and staining from lime dust.
Stage 2 It is highly probable that a percentage of the brickwork has suffered from varying degrees of failure. The repairs are performed using various techniques:
If damage is severe, brickwork is replaced using the appropriate match
If damage is minor, the brickwork is cut out and the reverse side utilised
When damage is superficial, a colour-matched repair paste is applied
Stage 3 The building is cleaned traditionally by hand with water, brushes and carborundum stones. Corrosive chemicals and pressure-washing equipment are not used to avoid irreparable damage to the facade. The use of water also activates the dormant lime within the existing mortar, which will provide the appropriate required bond with the pointing.
Stage 4 A light cement wash of the appropriate colour is applied to seal the brick face and protect the building from water and frost damage. Chemical sealants are avoided so to prevent trapping residue water within brickwork and preventing the building fabric from breathing.
Stage 5 The final stage of repointing is performed using bespoke hand tools specifically designed for achieving the
correct original weather-struck and cut joint, which require individual manufacture. The mortar used consists of
sharp sand – which is sieved by hand – lime and minimal quantities of Portland cement. Chemical additives and Portland cements are generally avoided due to the appropriate bond that is achieved through the lime content. Chemical additives and today’s cements have the reverse affects required with the pointing, failing to make the required bond with the original lime mortar.
Obsolescence of building fabric
Secondly, the mortar has been prepared without a consistent form of measurement, indicated by the array of different colours. Thirdly, the staining of the brick face during the preparation stage indicates the elevations were not cleaned and, subsequently, the original dormant lime not reactivated. Finally, the quality of the cut of the pointing is poor, resulting in the perception of uneven brickwork. |
|||||||||||||
| Copyright 2006 BulBuild |
|
|||||||||||||